Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_udQXJvQIAXoNU

Amazon is wrongfully charging excessive long-term storage fees

One of my FNSKUs has been incurring long-term storage fees since February. However, when we checked the sellable quantity, reserved quantity, and removable quantity, there is actually no stock available to sell or remove. So what inventory is actually generating these fees?

We've been contacting Amazon since February, but the issue still hasn't been resolved. Case ID: 10804296912.

Is this how Amazon unfairly charges sellers long-term storage fees?

123 views
5 replies
Tags:Chargebacks, FBA, Fulfilment Centre, Lost shipment, Ship to FC
20
Reply
user profile
Seller_udQXJvQIAXoNU

Amazon is wrongfully charging excessive long-term storage fees

One of my FNSKUs has been incurring long-term storage fees since February. However, when we checked the sellable quantity, reserved quantity, and removable quantity, there is actually no stock available to sell or remove. So what inventory is actually generating these fees?

We've been contacting Amazon since February, but the issue still hasn't been resolved. Case ID: 10804296912.

Is this how Amazon unfairly charges sellers long-term storage fees?

Tags:Chargebacks, FBA, Fulfilment Centre, Lost shipment, Ship to FC
20
123 views
5 replies
Reply
5 replies
user profile
Seller_ZQyopdiwkUHOZ

Have you run an inventory report to see where it lists you as having stock?

00
user profile
Seller_z7QZnDAKHI9Ga

🔍 Possible Causes:

1. Phantom Inventory or Residual System Inventory:

Amazon’s backend database may still retain records of inventory that has already expired or should have been removed, leading the system to incorrectly assume that stock still exists and triggering storage fee charges.

2. Warehouse Counting or Operational Errors:

It is possible that internal FBA warehouse operations encountered errors, such as:

Lost inventory that was not properly updated in the system

Units incorrectly assigned to the wrong ASIN or FNSKU

Delayed or incomplete system synchronization

3. Desynchronization Between Aged Inventory Surcharge and Actual Inventory:

The Aged Inventory Surcharge report may be using a different backend data source from reports like the FBA Inventory Report. This kind of inconsistency has been reported by other sellers before.

✅ Recommended Actions You Can Take:

📌 Step 1: Download and Review Detailed Reports

Log in to Seller Central and download the following reports:

Aged Inventory Surcharge Report

Inventory Event Detail Report

FBA Inventory History Report

Reserved Inventory Report

Removable Inventory Report

Check especially for "unsellable" or "processing" inventory that may still exist in the system as “ghost” inventory.

📌 Step 2: Open a Case Clearly Stating That the Charges Are Due to Phantom Inventory

It is recommended to open a new case or reopen the existing one, using language like the following template:

📨 English Case Template:

Subject: Incorrect Long-Term Storage Fees on Nonexistent Inventory – Case Reopen Request

Hello,

Since February, one of my FNSKUs has been incurring Aged Inventory Surcharge fees. However, all inventory reports (Sellable, Reserved, and Removable) show zero quantity.

Only the Aged Inventory Surcharge report shows virtual inventory and charges high fees. This appears to be a system inconsistency — there is no inventory available to sell or remove.

We believe this is caused by phantom/ghost inventory or inventory misclassification, and kindly request a full investigation and reimbursement of the incorrect charges.

Case ID: 10804296912 (previously opened but still unresolved)

Please escalate this to the FBA Inventory Team or Payment Investigation Team.

Best regards,

[Your Name / Store Name]

📌 Step 3: Submit an “FBA Investigation and Reimbursement” Form

You can also try to resolve the issue by submitting a formal investigation and claim form. To do so, follow this path:

Seller Central > Help > Search "FBA investigation" > Select "Investigate FBA Inventory Issues"

Provide your FNSKU, related Case ID, and a clear description of the issue as above.

30
user profile
Seller_DJqWlEby6fi8n

Do you use the European Fulfillment Network (EFN) system in the EU? We've been charged wrongful storage and long-term storage fees for a very long time. We've been chasing this for nearly a year now.

Amazon have repeatedly told us it was fixed, most recently in the past few days, but every time they continued to charge us again in the following months. They recently told us the same a you, that there was no stock to remove, it was a problem with their system.

Now they are basically saying there is no EFN system, that sales can only be made in the EU country where the stock is stored, in our case Spain.

It's a total nightmare and Amazon just treats us like dirt. This is the history of our case https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/e63f0a7a-9122-4d11-9a62-164025109fb2.

Recently I asked for clarification on the outstanding issues by asking these questions below. Seller support didn't answer them and closed the case!! Again!! I have to keep reopening it.

Let me know if you get anywhere with this. It's been going on for too long for us to let this drop now (even if it really is fixed this time, which is probably unlikely, we need Amazon to make things right with us), and I'm interested in what the next steps could be.

Questioned I asked of seller support for clarification:

"If you disagree with any of the points outlined, respond with the specific items and your reason for disagreeing. Given the significant amount of contradictory information we’ve received from Amazon since this issue began, this will help ensure we have a clear and shared understanding of where we agree and where differences remain.

1. Prolonged Operational Failure by Amazon

For over 11 months, Amazon repeatedly failed to transfer inventory to the correct Spanish Fulfillment Centers (FCs), despite multiple confirmations that they had initiated or completed this process.

Internal contradictions in their messages show an inability to execute or manage their logistics across EU warehouses effectively, particularly within their own EFN (European Fulfillment Network) system.

2. Misleading Communications and Unfulfilled Assurances

On multiple occasions, Amazon promised that units would be moved within 14 days, or that “upload errors” had been resolved.

By January 2025, Amazon claimed that some units had been moved, which was factually incorrect at the time.

Inconsistencies and broken promises are not merely administrative failings — they directly impacted business planning, cash flow, and inventory strategy.

3. Lack of Functional EFN System

Amazon misrepresented the operational reality of EFN. We were led to believe that storing inventory in Spain allowed fulfillment to the wider EU, when in fact, disabling exports restricted orders to Spain only.

This miscommunication caused us to overstock Spain under false pretenses, directly leading to a high likelihood of long-term storage charges and tying up capital in non-moving stock.

4. Amazon’s Own Inability to Resolve the Problem

Even Amazon’s internal teams failed to remove or relocate the inventory, ultimately choosing to purchase it themselves — proof of the system's dysfunction.

Now, Amazon is suggesting that we (who lack access to unauthorized warehouses) should resolve what Amazon itself could not resolve in over six months by arranging to remove stock from unauthorised warehoues ourselves - obviously an impossibility as even Amazon themselves are unable to do this.

5. Continued Financial Harm

We are still receiving long-term storage charges from unauthorized locations and are now at risk of further long term charges from Spain due to systemic miscommunication and Amazon's failure to deliver on the promise of EU-wide fulfillment.

These are real, documentable financial losses, not theoretical or "perceived" — losses caused by reliance on Amazon's own written guidance.

6. Business and Time Losses

The time spent managing this issue — hundreds of hours of correspondence, logistics adjustments, financial tracking, and disrupted stock flow — represents a significant operational burden that goes uncompensated.

We were also advised to set up Spanish VAT registration, which now serves no purpose due to Amazon’s EFN limitations. This is a costly and time-consuming sunk cost directly caused by Amazon’s misguidance.

7. Amazon's Legal and Ethical Responsibility

Under consumer and commercial protection standards, Amazon has a duty of care not to mislead business partners or impose preventable losses.

Their ongoing refusal to recognize real financial harm contradicts prior statements acknowledging the impact to our business and offers to seek fair compensation."

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_udQXJvQIAXoNU

Amazon is wrongfully charging excessive long-term storage fees

One of my FNSKUs has been incurring long-term storage fees since February. However, when we checked the sellable quantity, reserved quantity, and removable quantity, there is actually no stock available to sell or remove. So what inventory is actually generating these fees?

We've been contacting Amazon since February, but the issue still hasn't been resolved. Case ID: 10804296912.

Is this how Amazon unfairly charges sellers long-term storage fees?

123 views
5 replies
Tags:Chargebacks, FBA, Fulfilment Centre, Lost shipment, Ship to FC
20
Reply
user profile
Seller_udQXJvQIAXoNU

Amazon is wrongfully charging excessive long-term storage fees

One of my FNSKUs has been incurring long-term storage fees since February. However, when we checked the sellable quantity, reserved quantity, and removable quantity, there is actually no stock available to sell or remove. So what inventory is actually generating these fees?

We've been contacting Amazon since February, but the issue still hasn't been resolved. Case ID: 10804296912.

Is this how Amazon unfairly charges sellers long-term storage fees?

Tags:Chargebacks, FBA, Fulfilment Centre, Lost shipment, Ship to FC
20
123 views
5 replies
Reply
user profile

Amazon is wrongfully charging excessive long-term storage fees

by Seller_udQXJvQIAXoNU

One of my FNSKUs has been incurring long-term storage fees since February. However, when we checked the sellable quantity, reserved quantity, and removable quantity, there is actually no stock available to sell or remove. So what inventory is actually generating these fees?

We've been contacting Amazon since February, but the issue still hasn't been resolved. Case ID: 10804296912.

Is this how Amazon unfairly charges sellers long-term storage fees?

Tags:Chargebacks, FBA, Fulfilment Centre, Lost shipment, Ship to FC
20
123 views
5 replies
Reply
5 replies
5 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Seller_ZQyopdiwkUHOZ

Have you run an inventory report to see where it lists you as having stock?

00
user profile
Seller_z7QZnDAKHI9Ga

🔍 Possible Causes:

1. Phantom Inventory or Residual System Inventory:

Amazon’s backend database may still retain records of inventory that has already expired or should have been removed, leading the system to incorrectly assume that stock still exists and triggering storage fee charges.

2. Warehouse Counting or Operational Errors:

It is possible that internal FBA warehouse operations encountered errors, such as:

Lost inventory that was not properly updated in the system

Units incorrectly assigned to the wrong ASIN or FNSKU

Delayed or incomplete system synchronization

3. Desynchronization Between Aged Inventory Surcharge and Actual Inventory:

The Aged Inventory Surcharge report may be using a different backend data source from reports like the FBA Inventory Report. This kind of inconsistency has been reported by other sellers before.

✅ Recommended Actions You Can Take:

📌 Step 1: Download and Review Detailed Reports

Log in to Seller Central and download the following reports:

Aged Inventory Surcharge Report

Inventory Event Detail Report

FBA Inventory History Report

Reserved Inventory Report

Removable Inventory Report

Check especially for "unsellable" or "processing" inventory that may still exist in the system as “ghost” inventory.

📌 Step 2: Open a Case Clearly Stating That the Charges Are Due to Phantom Inventory

It is recommended to open a new case or reopen the existing one, using language like the following template:

📨 English Case Template:

Subject: Incorrect Long-Term Storage Fees on Nonexistent Inventory – Case Reopen Request

Hello,

Since February, one of my FNSKUs has been incurring Aged Inventory Surcharge fees. However, all inventory reports (Sellable, Reserved, and Removable) show zero quantity.

Only the Aged Inventory Surcharge report shows virtual inventory and charges high fees. This appears to be a system inconsistency — there is no inventory available to sell or remove.

We believe this is caused by phantom/ghost inventory or inventory misclassification, and kindly request a full investigation and reimbursement of the incorrect charges.

Case ID: 10804296912 (previously opened but still unresolved)

Please escalate this to the FBA Inventory Team or Payment Investigation Team.

Best regards,

[Your Name / Store Name]

📌 Step 3: Submit an “FBA Investigation and Reimbursement” Form

You can also try to resolve the issue by submitting a formal investigation and claim form. To do so, follow this path:

Seller Central > Help > Search "FBA investigation" > Select "Investigate FBA Inventory Issues"

Provide your FNSKU, related Case ID, and a clear description of the issue as above.

30
user profile
Seller_DJqWlEby6fi8n

Do you use the European Fulfillment Network (EFN) system in the EU? We've been charged wrongful storage and long-term storage fees for a very long time. We've been chasing this for nearly a year now.

Amazon have repeatedly told us it was fixed, most recently in the past few days, but every time they continued to charge us again in the following months. They recently told us the same a you, that there was no stock to remove, it was a problem with their system.

Now they are basically saying there is no EFN system, that sales can only be made in the EU country where the stock is stored, in our case Spain.

It's a total nightmare and Amazon just treats us like dirt. This is the history of our case https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/e63f0a7a-9122-4d11-9a62-164025109fb2.

Recently I asked for clarification on the outstanding issues by asking these questions below. Seller support didn't answer them and closed the case!! Again!! I have to keep reopening it.

Let me know if you get anywhere with this. It's been going on for too long for us to let this drop now (even if it really is fixed this time, which is probably unlikely, we need Amazon to make things right with us), and I'm interested in what the next steps could be.

Questioned I asked of seller support for clarification:

"If you disagree with any of the points outlined, respond with the specific items and your reason for disagreeing. Given the significant amount of contradictory information we’ve received from Amazon since this issue began, this will help ensure we have a clear and shared understanding of where we agree and where differences remain.

1. Prolonged Operational Failure by Amazon

For over 11 months, Amazon repeatedly failed to transfer inventory to the correct Spanish Fulfillment Centers (FCs), despite multiple confirmations that they had initiated or completed this process.

Internal contradictions in their messages show an inability to execute or manage their logistics across EU warehouses effectively, particularly within their own EFN (European Fulfillment Network) system.

2. Misleading Communications and Unfulfilled Assurances

On multiple occasions, Amazon promised that units would be moved within 14 days, or that “upload errors” had been resolved.

By January 2025, Amazon claimed that some units had been moved, which was factually incorrect at the time.

Inconsistencies and broken promises are not merely administrative failings — they directly impacted business planning, cash flow, and inventory strategy.

3. Lack of Functional EFN System

Amazon misrepresented the operational reality of EFN. We were led to believe that storing inventory in Spain allowed fulfillment to the wider EU, when in fact, disabling exports restricted orders to Spain only.

This miscommunication caused us to overstock Spain under false pretenses, directly leading to a high likelihood of long-term storage charges and tying up capital in non-moving stock.

4. Amazon’s Own Inability to Resolve the Problem

Even Amazon’s internal teams failed to remove or relocate the inventory, ultimately choosing to purchase it themselves — proof of the system's dysfunction.

Now, Amazon is suggesting that we (who lack access to unauthorized warehouses) should resolve what Amazon itself could not resolve in over six months by arranging to remove stock from unauthorised warehoues ourselves - obviously an impossibility as even Amazon themselves are unable to do this.

5. Continued Financial Harm

We are still receiving long-term storage charges from unauthorized locations and are now at risk of further long term charges from Spain due to systemic miscommunication and Amazon's failure to deliver on the promise of EU-wide fulfillment.

These are real, documentable financial losses, not theoretical or "perceived" — losses caused by reliance on Amazon's own written guidance.

6. Business and Time Losses

The time spent managing this issue — hundreds of hours of correspondence, logistics adjustments, financial tracking, and disrupted stock flow — represents a significant operational burden that goes uncompensated.

We were also advised to set up Spanish VAT registration, which now serves no purpose due to Amazon’s EFN limitations. This is a costly and time-consuming sunk cost directly caused by Amazon’s misguidance.

7. Amazon's Legal and Ethical Responsibility

Under consumer and commercial protection standards, Amazon has a duty of care not to mislead business partners or impose preventable losses.

Their ongoing refusal to recognize real financial harm contradicts prior statements acknowledging the impact to our business and offers to seek fair compensation."

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_ZQyopdiwkUHOZ

Have you run an inventory report to see where it lists you as having stock?

00
user profile
Seller_ZQyopdiwkUHOZ

Have you run an inventory report to see where it lists you as having stock?

00
Reply
user profile
Seller_z7QZnDAKHI9Ga

🔍 Possible Causes:

1. Phantom Inventory or Residual System Inventory:

Amazon’s backend database may still retain records of inventory that has already expired or should have been removed, leading the system to incorrectly assume that stock still exists and triggering storage fee charges.

2. Warehouse Counting or Operational Errors:

It is possible that internal FBA warehouse operations encountered errors, such as:

Lost inventory that was not properly updated in the system

Units incorrectly assigned to the wrong ASIN or FNSKU

Delayed or incomplete system synchronization

3. Desynchronization Between Aged Inventory Surcharge and Actual Inventory:

The Aged Inventory Surcharge report may be using a different backend data source from reports like the FBA Inventory Report. This kind of inconsistency has been reported by other sellers before.

✅ Recommended Actions You Can Take:

📌 Step 1: Download and Review Detailed Reports

Log in to Seller Central and download the following reports:

Aged Inventory Surcharge Report

Inventory Event Detail Report

FBA Inventory History Report

Reserved Inventory Report

Removable Inventory Report

Check especially for "unsellable" or "processing" inventory that may still exist in the system as “ghost” inventory.

📌 Step 2: Open a Case Clearly Stating That the Charges Are Due to Phantom Inventory

It is recommended to open a new case or reopen the existing one, using language like the following template:

📨 English Case Template:

Subject: Incorrect Long-Term Storage Fees on Nonexistent Inventory – Case Reopen Request

Hello,

Since February, one of my FNSKUs has been incurring Aged Inventory Surcharge fees. However, all inventory reports (Sellable, Reserved, and Removable) show zero quantity.

Only the Aged Inventory Surcharge report shows virtual inventory and charges high fees. This appears to be a system inconsistency — there is no inventory available to sell or remove.

We believe this is caused by phantom/ghost inventory or inventory misclassification, and kindly request a full investigation and reimbursement of the incorrect charges.

Case ID: 10804296912 (previously opened but still unresolved)

Please escalate this to the FBA Inventory Team or Payment Investigation Team.

Best regards,

[Your Name / Store Name]

📌 Step 3: Submit an “FBA Investigation and Reimbursement” Form

You can also try to resolve the issue by submitting a formal investigation and claim form. To do so, follow this path:

Seller Central > Help > Search "FBA investigation" > Select "Investigate FBA Inventory Issues"

Provide your FNSKU, related Case ID, and a clear description of the issue as above.

30
user profile
Seller_z7QZnDAKHI9Ga

🔍 Possible Causes:

1. Phantom Inventory or Residual System Inventory:

Amazon’s backend database may still retain records of inventory that has already expired or should have been removed, leading the system to incorrectly assume that stock still exists and triggering storage fee charges.

2. Warehouse Counting or Operational Errors:

It is possible that internal FBA warehouse operations encountered errors, such as:

Lost inventory that was not properly updated in the system

Units incorrectly assigned to the wrong ASIN or FNSKU

Delayed or incomplete system synchronization

3. Desynchronization Between Aged Inventory Surcharge and Actual Inventory:

The Aged Inventory Surcharge report may be using a different backend data source from reports like the FBA Inventory Report. This kind of inconsistency has been reported by other sellers before.

✅ Recommended Actions You Can Take:

📌 Step 1: Download and Review Detailed Reports

Log in to Seller Central and download the following reports:

Aged Inventory Surcharge Report

Inventory Event Detail Report

FBA Inventory History Report

Reserved Inventory Report

Removable Inventory Report

Check especially for "unsellable" or "processing" inventory that may still exist in the system as “ghost” inventory.

📌 Step 2: Open a Case Clearly Stating That the Charges Are Due to Phantom Inventory

It is recommended to open a new case or reopen the existing one, using language like the following template:

📨 English Case Template:

Subject: Incorrect Long-Term Storage Fees on Nonexistent Inventory – Case Reopen Request

Hello,

Since February, one of my FNSKUs has been incurring Aged Inventory Surcharge fees. However, all inventory reports (Sellable, Reserved, and Removable) show zero quantity.

Only the Aged Inventory Surcharge report shows virtual inventory and charges high fees. This appears to be a system inconsistency — there is no inventory available to sell or remove.

We believe this is caused by phantom/ghost inventory or inventory misclassification, and kindly request a full investigation and reimbursement of the incorrect charges.

Case ID: 10804296912 (previously opened but still unresolved)

Please escalate this to the FBA Inventory Team or Payment Investigation Team.

Best regards,

[Your Name / Store Name]

📌 Step 3: Submit an “FBA Investigation and Reimbursement” Form

You can also try to resolve the issue by submitting a formal investigation and claim form. To do so, follow this path:

Seller Central > Help > Search "FBA investigation" > Select "Investigate FBA Inventory Issues"

Provide your FNSKU, related Case ID, and a clear description of the issue as above.

30
Reply
user profile
Seller_DJqWlEby6fi8n

Do you use the European Fulfillment Network (EFN) system in the EU? We've been charged wrongful storage and long-term storage fees for a very long time. We've been chasing this for nearly a year now.

Amazon have repeatedly told us it was fixed, most recently in the past few days, but every time they continued to charge us again in the following months. They recently told us the same a you, that there was no stock to remove, it was a problem with their system.

Now they are basically saying there is no EFN system, that sales can only be made in the EU country where the stock is stored, in our case Spain.

It's a total nightmare and Amazon just treats us like dirt. This is the history of our case https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/e63f0a7a-9122-4d11-9a62-164025109fb2.

Recently I asked for clarification on the outstanding issues by asking these questions below. Seller support didn't answer them and closed the case!! Again!! I have to keep reopening it.

Let me know if you get anywhere with this. It's been going on for too long for us to let this drop now (even if it really is fixed this time, which is probably unlikely, we need Amazon to make things right with us), and I'm interested in what the next steps could be.

Questioned I asked of seller support for clarification:

"If you disagree with any of the points outlined, respond with the specific items and your reason for disagreeing. Given the significant amount of contradictory information we’ve received from Amazon since this issue began, this will help ensure we have a clear and shared understanding of where we agree and where differences remain.

1. Prolonged Operational Failure by Amazon

For over 11 months, Amazon repeatedly failed to transfer inventory to the correct Spanish Fulfillment Centers (FCs), despite multiple confirmations that they had initiated or completed this process.

Internal contradictions in their messages show an inability to execute or manage their logistics across EU warehouses effectively, particularly within their own EFN (European Fulfillment Network) system.

2. Misleading Communications and Unfulfilled Assurances

On multiple occasions, Amazon promised that units would be moved within 14 days, or that “upload errors” had been resolved.

By January 2025, Amazon claimed that some units had been moved, which was factually incorrect at the time.

Inconsistencies and broken promises are not merely administrative failings — they directly impacted business planning, cash flow, and inventory strategy.

3. Lack of Functional EFN System

Amazon misrepresented the operational reality of EFN. We were led to believe that storing inventory in Spain allowed fulfillment to the wider EU, when in fact, disabling exports restricted orders to Spain only.

This miscommunication caused us to overstock Spain under false pretenses, directly leading to a high likelihood of long-term storage charges and tying up capital in non-moving stock.

4. Amazon’s Own Inability to Resolve the Problem

Even Amazon’s internal teams failed to remove or relocate the inventory, ultimately choosing to purchase it themselves — proof of the system's dysfunction.

Now, Amazon is suggesting that we (who lack access to unauthorized warehouses) should resolve what Amazon itself could not resolve in over six months by arranging to remove stock from unauthorised warehoues ourselves - obviously an impossibility as even Amazon themselves are unable to do this.

5. Continued Financial Harm

We are still receiving long-term storage charges from unauthorized locations and are now at risk of further long term charges from Spain due to systemic miscommunication and Amazon's failure to deliver on the promise of EU-wide fulfillment.

These are real, documentable financial losses, not theoretical or "perceived" — losses caused by reliance on Amazon's own written guidance.

6. Business and Time Losses

The time spent managing this issue — hundreds of hours of correspondence, logistics adjustments, financial tracking, and disrupted stock flow — represents a significant operational burden that goes uncompensated.

We were also advised to set up Spanish VAT registration, which now serves no purpose due to Amazon’s EFN limitations. This is a costly and time-consuming sunk cost directly caused by Amazon’s misguidance.

7. Amazon's Legal and Ethical Responsibility

Under consumer and commercial protection standards, Amazon has a duty of care not to mislead business partners or impose preventable losses.

Their ongoing refusal to recognize real financial harm contradicts prior statements acknowledging the impact to our business and offers to seek fair compensation."

10
user profile
Seller_DJqWlEby6fi8n

Do you use the European Fulfillment Network (EFN) system in the EU? We've been charged wrongful storage and long-term storage fees for a very long time. We've been chasing this for nearly a year now.

Amazon have repeatedly told us it was fixed, most recently in the past few days, but every time they continued to charge us again in the following months. They recently told us the same a you, that there was no stock to remove, it was a problem with their system.

Now they are basically saying there is no EFN system, that sales can only be made in the EU country where the stock is stored, in our case Spain.

It's a total nightmare and Amazon just treats us like dirt. This is the history of our case https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/e63f0a7a-9122-4d11-9a62-164025109fb2.

Recently I asked for clarification on the outstanding issues by asking these questions below. Seller support didn't answer them and closed the case!! Again!! I have to keep reopening it.

Let me know if you get anywhere with this. It's been going on for too long for us to let this drop now (even if it really is fixed this time, which is probably unlikely, we need Amazon to make things right with us), and I'm interested in what the next steps could be.

Questioned I asked of seller support for clarification:

"If you disagree with any of the points outlined, respond with the specific items and your reason for disagreeing. Given the significant amount of contradictory information we’ve received from Amazon since this issue began, this will help ensure we have a clear and shared understanding of where we agree and where differences remain.

1. Prolonged Operational Failure by Amazon

For over 11 months, Amazon repeatedly failed to transfer inventory to the correct Spanish Fulfillment Centers (FCs), despite multiple confirmations that they had initiated or completed this process.

Internal contradictions in their messages show an inability to execute or manage their logistics across EU warehouses effectively, particularly within their own EFN (European Fulfillment Network) system.

2. Misleading Communications and Unfulfilled Assurances

On multiple occasions, Amazon promised that units would be moved within 14 days, or that “upload errors” had been resolved.

By January 2025, Amazon claimed that some units had been moved, which was factually incorrect at the time.

Inconsistencies and broken promises are not merely administrative failings — they directly impacted business planning, cash flow, and inventory strategy.

3. Lack of Functional EFN System

Amazon misrepresented the operational reality of EFN. We were led to believe that storing inventory in Spain allowed fulfillment to the wider EU, when in fact, disabling exports restricted orders to Spain only.

This miscommunication caused us to overstock Spain under false pretenses, directly leading to a high likelihood of long-term storage charges and tying up capital in non-moving stock.

4. Amazon’s Own Inability to Resolve the Problem

Even Amazon’s internal teams failed to remove or relocate the inventory, ultimately choosing to purchase it themselves — proof of the system's dysfunction.

Now, Amazon is suggesting that we (who lack access to unauthorized warehouses) should resolve what Amazon itself could not resolve in over six months by arranging to remove stock from unauthorised warehoues ourselves - obviously an impossibility as even Amazon themselves are unable to do this.

5. Continued Financial Harm

We are still receiving long-term storage charges from unauthorized locations and are now at risk of further long term charges from Spain due to systemic miscommunication and Amazon's failure to deliver on the promise of EU-wide fulfillment.

These are real, documentable financial losses, not theoretical or "perceived" — losses caused by reliance on Amazon's own written guidance.

6. Business and Time Losses

The time spent managing this issue — hundreds of hours of correspondence, logistics adjustments, financial tracking, and disrupted stock flow — represents a significant operational burden that goes uncompensated.

We were also advised to set up Spanish VAT registration, which now serves no purpose due to Amazon’s EFN limitations. This is a costly and time-consuming sunk cost directly caused by Amazon’s misguidance.

7. Amazon's Legal and Ethical Responsibility

Under consumer and commercial protection standards, Amazon has a duty of care not to mislead business partners or impose preventable losses.

Their ongoing refusal to recognize real financial harm contradicts prior statements acknowledging the impact to our business and offers to seek fair compensation."

10
Reply
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity