Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM

inbound placement fee is erratic and random..listen to this

I have about 200 units of 11 differnt skus to send into amazon. I tried to divide each item evenly into 6 different boxes. However, on of the SKUS there was an extra. I didn't have to pay a placement fee. I then went back to change it to add more of one unit since I can fit one more SKU of an item that was already in there into the box (added 6 more). It mandated a placement fee and a full one at that. I then went back and changed it to the original shipping plan, but the one extra unit I put it in the beginning instead of the back (in box 1 instread of box 6). It gave me the best option as a partial placement fee. I thought to myself..how? It just said 5 minutes ago no placement fee. I kept playing with it and put the one SKU that had an extra in box 6 instead of box 1. It then waived the placement fee.

This thing is random and just plain ridiculous. Changing 1 SKU from box 1 to box 6 changed it from 50% less. How in the world are we supposed to know which box to put it in? If we have several small SKUS and several can fit it into a box then what are we supposed to run every single permutation/combination to figure out a possible combination to no placement fee? How are we supposed to adequately come up with cost in these scenarios??????

Amazon needs to do away with this fee.

1.7K views
38 replies
Tags:FBA, Fulfilment
770
Reply
user profile
Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM

inbound placement fee is erratic and random..listen to this

I have about 200 units of 11 differnt skus to send into amazon. I tried to divide each item evenly into 6 different boxes. However, on of the SKUS there was an extra. I didn't have to pay a placement fee. I then went back to change it to add more of one unit since I can fit one more SKU of an item that was already in there into the box (added 6 more). It mandated a placement fee and a full one at that. I then went back and changed it to the original shipping plan, but the one extra unit I put it in the beginning instead of the back (in box 1 instread of box 6). It gave me the best option as a partial placement fee. I thought to myself..how? It just said 5 minutes ago no placement fee. I kept playing with it and put the one SKU that had an extra in box 6 instead of box 1. It then waived the placement fee.

This thing is random and just plain ridiculous. Changing 1 SKU from box 1 to box 6 changed it from 50% less. How in the world are we supposed to know which box to put it in? If we have several small SKUS and several can fit it into a box then what are we supposed to run every single permutation/combination to figure out a possible combination to no placement fee? How are we supposed to adequately come up with cost in these scenarios??????

Amazon needs to do away with this fee.

Tags:FBA, Fulfilment
770
1.7K views
38 replies
Reply
38 replies
user profile
KJ_Amazon

Hello @Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM. Thanks for sharing that feedback about inbound placement fees and the process in determining the best shipment options. We are continuing to share feedback with our partner teams on the process.

I understand that it can be frustrating to try different options, but I am glad you were able to find the most effective shipment option.

KJ_Amazon

472
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

The whole process is absurd. It shocks me that someone at Amazon looked at the new send to Amazon and thought this is a good system.

Some shipments they force you to split , most they dont, but that doesnt show up until after youve packed.

The whole process is worse as a seller than what they had before.

411
user profile
Seller_T4vlYvNrOWBSq

it is a total mess. Sometimes it will take a sku out from a box with other skus, but then when I add more skus in, it puts the removed ones back is and then separates some of the new ones out

Then there's the fees. Randomly some skus will generate fees that are 10x the normal fees, with no rational explanation as to why this box was $2.15 and that box is $18.45

Oh yeah, and shipping costs are 25% higher too.

FBA is becoming a severe money grab rather than a tool to streamline our shipping

Probably going to start switching to FBM soon

231
user profile
Seller_EIvjZFMoS70AU

i experienced a similar thing yesterday. I had prepared four boxes of product to ship instead of the usual 1 box. When I got to the placement fee, it gave no option for free placement but showed one box going to one place, another box going to another, and two boxes going to a third place. I increased the units per box to get them over 100, and there was no difference. I previously had tested this setup, and it gave me the option for no placement fee by creating four shipments, but now it wants $70 by showing only three shipments.

So I created a fifth box and submitted this, and it finally gave me the option for no placement fee, but it created five shipments. Overall, my thought is that Amazon really doesn't want us to experience the free placement, and this is a temporary ruse to make us think we have options but that free placement will eventually go away or be unachievable.

200
user profile
Seller_2y6Eow986wUGX

I had a 5 box shipment with 2 odd numbers and placement fees moved them all to same number no fee ie

19 19 18 18 18 had a box fee one sku other sku were all 25 units

18 18 18 18 18 18 and 2nd 25 all units no fee

Have the first 2 boxes with non identical amounts caused the issue so i kept 2 units here and only sent 90 in.

4 boxes of @ 23 ea and 25 other sku were a fee also

40
user profile
Seller_Xm9ZXdbDd6NZw

The only way I've been able to avoid it and avoid guessing games is to ship 5 boxes with exactly equal qty for each sku. So I make sure all inventory sent can be divided by 5. Still doubled the shipping fees but cheaper than placements.

120
user profile
Seller_zg0y8x3eUuxmH

Here's one, 4 skus, 3 boxes each so 12 boxes = placements fees. By adding a 5th sku, 1 box of 10 that would obviously have to be distributed, no placement fee. So adding something thats gonna cost them more money, reduces the fees?? Try the most absurd nonsensical thing you can think of, it just might work

70
user profile
Seller_m1K2JgvKy48rx

your mistake was mixing SKUs... trying 120 items of the same sku and send 20 of each skuski to 6 locations... or 6 boxes... they might have it go to 6 locations or 3 to 1 and 1 to 3 other facilities.... depending on demand they will say which centers need 1 or more boxes...

when you mix SKUs each SKU has to be able to split to 4 or more locations...

mixing 100 SKUs and 1 box each will not remove the placement fee .... each SKU has to be distributed in a way so it can hit 4 or more locations...

no placement fee...

sometimes I get away with 1 sku and 4 boxes or 1 sku and 5 boxes or 1 sku and 6 boxes...

keep playing around with combination but mixing SKus will make the math harder...

10
user profile
Seller_BDsTW810tZE6e

We've had the same issues with placement fees, it's also 100%+ the cost of our original shipments. I'm a fairly new seller, started in 2020 but I was chatting with another seller that does way more then us from Los Angeles, and he told me that Amazon used to have this fee structure and they're just going back to the old shipping plans they used to do. Not sure if this is true but had me thinking about Amazon's historical processes.

The placement fee isn't too bad when you're shipping 40 units but when you ship 250+ in one box or shipment plan it get's expensive real fast with placement fees.

We are trying AWD to see if that'll be a more cost effective option then directly to FBA Warehouses.

We also haven't seen any FBA per unit fee decrease that would offset this cost like Amazon promised in previous articles. The FBA fee seems mostly unchanged with additional costs for "Placement Fees" & Shipping to fulfillment centers across the USA, instead of a more local option...

10
user profile
Seller_Jq07AYj9eO4uX

My position is more extreme.

I have standard size, oversize and hazmat goods.

System forced me to either split all my full pallets goods and send 9 ltl shipments which cost $3000. or send 1 shipment pay $1500 plus $4000 placement fee.

All these goods only cost me $5000 but I'm paying $5500 to just ship to amazon warehouse???

50
user profile
Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM

inbound placement fee is erratic and random..listen to this

I have about 200 units of 11 differnt skus to send into amazon. I tried to divide each item evenly into 6 different boxes. However, on of the SKUS there was an extra. I didn't have to pay a placement fee. I then went back to change it to add more of one unit since I can fit one more SKU of an item that was already in there into the box (added 6 more). It mandated a placement fee and a full one at that. I then went back and changed it to the original shipping plan, but the one extra unit I put it in the beginning instead of the back (in box 1 instread of box 6). It gave me the best option as a partial placement fee. I thought to myself..how? It just said 5 minutes ago no placement fee. I kept playing with it and put the one SKU that had an extra in box 6 instead of box 1. It then waived the placement fee.

This thing is random and just plain ridiculous. Changing 1 SKU from box 1 to box 6 changed it from 50% less. How in the world are we supposed to know which box to put it in? If we have several small SKUS and several can fit it into a box then what are we supposed to run every single permutation/combination to figure out a possible combination to no placement fee? How are we supposed to adequately come up with cost in these scenarios??????

Amazon needs to do away with this fee.

1.7K views
38 replies
Tags:FBA, Fulfilment
770
Reply
user profile
Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM

inbound placement fee is erratic and random..listen to this

I have about 200 units of 11 differnt skus to send into amazon. I tried to divide each item evenly into 6 different boxes. However, on of the SKUS there was an extra. I didn't have to pay a placement fee. I then went back to change it to add more of one unit since I can fit one more SKU of an item that was already in there into the box (added 6 more). It mandated a placement fee and a full one at that. I then went back and changed it to the original shipping plan, but the one extra unit I put it in the beginning instead of the back (in box 1 instread of box 6). It gave me the best option as a partial placement fee. I thought to myself..how? It just said 5 minutes ago no placement fee. I kept playing with it and put the one SKU that had an extra in box 6 instead of box 1. It then waived the placement fee.

This thing is random and just plain ridiculous. Changing 1 SKU from box 1 to box 6 changed it from 50% less. How in the world are we supposed to know which box to put it in? If we have several small SKUS and several can fit it into a box then what are we supposed to run every single permutation/combination to figure out a possible combination to no placement fee? How are we supposed to adequately come up with cost in these scenarios??????

Amazon needs to do away with this fee.

Tags:FBA, Fulfilment
770
1.7K views
38 replies
Reply
user profile

inbound placement fee is erratic and random..listen to this

by Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM

I have about 200 units of 11 differnt skus to send into amazon. I tried to divide each item evenly into 6 different boxes. However, on of the SKUS there was an extra. I didn't have to pay a placement fee. I then went back to change it to add more of one unit since I can fit one more SKU of an item that was already in there into the box (added 6 more). It mandated a placement fee and a full one at that. I then went back and changed it to the original shipping plan, but the one extra unit I put it in the beginning instead of the back (in box 1 instread of box 6). It gave me the best option as a partial placement fee. I thought to myself..how? It just said 5 minutes ago no placement fee. I kept playing with it and put the one SKU that had an extra in box 6 instead of box 1. It then waived the placement fee.

This thing is random and just plain ridiculous. Changing 1 SKU from box 1 to box 6 changed it from 50% less. How in the world are we supposed to know which box to put it in? If we have several small SKUS and several can fit it into a box then what are we supposed to run every single permutation/combination to figure out a possible combination to no placement fee? How are we supposed to adequately come up with cost in these scenarios??????

Amazon needs to do away with this fee.

Tags:FBA, Fulfilment
770
1.7K views
38 replies
Reply
38 replies
38 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
KJ_Amazon

Hello @Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM. Thanks for sharing that feedback about inbound placement fees and the process in determining the best shipment options. We are continuing to share feedback with our partner teams on the process.

I understand that it can be frustrating to try different options, but I am glad you were able to find the most effective shipment option.

KJ_Amazon

472
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

The whole process is absurd. It shocks me that someone at Amazon looked at the new send to Amazon and thought this is a good system.

Some shipments they force you to split , most they dont, but that doesnt show up until after youve packed.

The whole process is worse as a seller than what they had before.

411
user profile
Seller_T4vlYvNrOWBSq

it is a total mess. Sometimes it will take a sku out from a box with other skus, but then when I add more skus in, it puts the removed ones back is and then separates some of the new ones out

Then there's the fees. Randomly some skus will generate fees that are 10x the normal fees, with no rational explanation as to why this box was $2.15 and that box is $18.45

Oh yeah, and shipping costs are 25% higher too.

FBA is becoming a severe money grab rather than a tool to streamline our shipping

Probably going to start switching to FBM soon

231
user profile
Seller_EIvjZFMoS70AU

i experienced a similar thing yesterday. I had prepared four boxes of product to ship instead of the usual 1 box. When I got to the placement fee, it gave no option for free placement but showed one box going to one place, another box going to another, and two boxes going to a third place. I increased the units per box to get them over 100, and there was no difference. I previously had tested this setup, and it gave me the option for no placement fee by creating four shipments, but now it wants $70 by showing only three shipments.

So I created a fifth box and submitted this, and it finally gave me the option for no placement fee, but it created five shipments. Overall, my thought is that Amazon really doesn't want us to experience the free placement, and this is a temporary ruse to make us think we have options but that free placement will eventually go away or be unachievable.

200
user profile
Seller_2y6Eow986wUGX

I had a 5 box shipment with 2 odd numbers and placement fees moved them all to same number no fee ie

19 19 18 18 18 had a box fee one sku other sku were all 25 units

18 18 18 18 18 18 and 2nd 25 all units no fee

Have the first 2 boxes with non identical amounts caused the issue so i kept 2 units here and only sent 90 in.

4 boxes of @ 23 ea and 25 other sku were a fee also

40
user profile
Seller_Xm9ZXdbDd6NZw

The only way I've been able to avoid it and avoid guessing games is to ship 5 boxes with exactly equal qty for each sku. So I make sure all inventory sent can be divided by 5. Still doubled the shipping fees but cheaper than placements.

120
user profile
Seller_zg0y8x3eUuxmH

Here's one, 4 skus, 3 boxes each so 12 boxes = placements fees. By adding a 5th sku, 1 box of 10 that would obviously have to be distributed, no placement fee. So adding something thats gonna cost them more money, reduces the fees?? Try the most absurd nonsensical thing you can think of, it just might work

70
user profile
Seller_m1K2JgvKy48rx

your mistake was mixing SKUs... trying 120 items of the same sku and send 20 of each skuski to 6 locations... or 6 boxes... they might have it go to 6 locations or 3 to 1 and 1 to 3 other facilities.... depending on demand they will say which centers need 1 or more boxes...

when you mix SKUs each SKU has to be able to split to 4 or more locations...

mixing 100 SKUs and 1 box each will not remove the placement fee .... each SKU has to be distributed in a way so it can hit 4 or more locations...

no placement fee...

sometimes I get away with 1 sku and 4 boxes or 1 sku and 5 boxes or 1 sku and 6 boxes...

keep playing around with combination but mixing SKus will make the math harder...

10
user profile
Seller_BDsTW810tZE6e

We've had the same issues with placement fees, it's also 100%+ the cost of our original shipments. I'm a fairly new seller, started in 2020 but I was chatting with another seller that does way more then us from Los Angeles, and he told me that Amazon used to have this fee structure and they're just going back to the old shipping plans they used to do. Not sure if this is true but had me thinking about Amazon's historical processes.

The placement fee isn't too bad when you're shipping 40 units but when you ship 250+ in one box or shipment plan it get's expensive real fast with placement fees.

We are trying AWD to see if that'll be a more cost effective option then directly to FBA Warehouses.

We also haven't seen any FBA per unit fee decrease that would offset this cost like Amazon promised in previous articles. The FBA fee seems mostly unchanged with additional costs for "Placement Fees" & Shipping to fulfillment centers across the USA, instead of a more local option...

10
user profile
Seller_Jq07AYj9eO4uX

My position is more extreme.

I have standard size, oversize and hazmat goods.

System forced me to either split all my full pallets goods and send 9 ltl shipments which cost $3000. or send 1 shipment pay $1500 plus $4000 placement fee.

All these goods only cost me $5000 but I'm paying $5500 to just ship to amazon warehouse???

50
user profile
KJ_Amazon

Hello @Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM. Thanks for sharing that feedback about inbound placement fees and the process in determining the best shipment options. We are continuing to share feedback with our partner teams on the process.

I understand that it can be frustrating to try different options, but I am glad you were able to find the most effective shipment option.

KJ_Amazon

472
user profile
KJ_Amazon

Hello @Seller_M4NWRaRnU1uDM. Thanks for sharing that feedback about inbound placement fees and the process in determining the best shipment options. We are continuing to share feedback with our partner teams on the process.

I understand that it can be frustrating to try different options, but I am glad you were able to find the most effective shipment option.

KJ_Amazon

472
Reply
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

The whole process is absurd. It shocks me that someone at Amazon looked at the new send to Amazon and thought this is a good system.

Some shipments they force you to split , most they dont, but that doesnt show up until after youve packed.

The whole process is worse as a seller than what they had before.

411
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

The whole process is absurd. It shocks me that someone at Amazon looked at the new send to Amazon and thought this is a good system.

Some shipments they force you to split , most they dont, but that doesnt show up until after youve packed.

The whole process is worse as a seller than what they had before.

411
Reply
user profile
Seller_T4vlYvNrOWBSq

it is a total mess. Sometimes it will take a sku out from a box with other skus, but then when I add more skus in, it puts the removed ones back is and then separates some of the new ones out

Then there's the fees. Randomly some skus will generate fees that are 10x the normal fees, with no rational explanation as to why this box was $2.15 and that box is $18.45

Oh yeah, and shipping costs are 25% higher too.

FBA is becoming a severe money grab rather than a tool to streamline our shipping

Probably going to start switching to FBM soon

231
user profile
Seller_T4vlYvNrOWBSq

it is a total mess. Sometimes it will take a sku out from a box with other skus, but then when I add more skus in, it puts the removed ones back is and then separates some of the new ones out

Then there's the fees. Randomly some skus will generate fees that are 10x the normal fees, with no rational explanation as to why this box was $2.15 and that box is $18.45

Oh yeah, and shipping costs are 25% higher too.

FBA is becoming a severe money grab rather than a tool to streamline our shipping

Probably going to start switching to FBM soon

231
Reply
user profile
Seller_EIvjZFMoS70AU

i experienced a similar thing yesterday. I had prepared four boxes of product to ship instead of the usual 1 box. When I got to the placement fee, it gave no option for free placement but showed one box going to one place, another box going to another, and two boxes going to a third place. I increased the units per box to get them over 100, and there was no difference. I previously had tested this setup, and it gave me the option for no placement fee by creating four shipments, but now it wants $70 by showing only three shipments.

So I created a fifth box and submitted this, and it finally gave me the option for no placement fee, but it created five shipments. Overall, my thought is that Amazon really doesn't want us to experience the free placement, and this is a temporary ruse to make us think we have options but that free placement will eventually go away or be unachievable.

200
user profile
Seller_EIvjZFMoS70AU

i experienced a similar thing yesterday. I had prepared four boxes of product to ship instead of the usual 1 box. When I got to the placement fee, it gave no option for free placement but showed one box going to one place, another box going to another, and two boxes going to a third place. I increased the units per box to get them over 100, and there was no difference. I previously had tested this setup, and it gave me the option for no placement fee by creating four shipments, but now it wants $70 by showing only three shipments.

So I created a fifth box and submitted this, and it finally gave me the option for no placement fee, but it created five shipments. Overall, my thought is that Amazon really doesn't want us to experience the free placement, and this is a temporary ruse to make us think we have options but that free placement will eventually go away or be unachievable.

200
Reply
user profile
Seller_2y6Eow986wUGX

I had a 5 box shipment with 2 odd numbers and placement fees moved them all to same number no fee ie

19 19 18 18 18 had a box fee one sku other sku were all 25 units

18 18 18 18 18 18 and 2nd 25 all units no fee

Have the first 2 boxes with non identical amounts caused the issue so i kept 2 units here and only sent 90 in.

4 boxes of @ 23 ea and 25 other sku were a fee also

40
user profile
Seller_2y6Eow986wUGX

I had a 5 box shipment with 2 odd numbers and placement fees moved them all to same number no fee ie

19 19 18 18 18 had a box fee one sku other sku were all 25 units

18 18 18 18 18 18 and 2nd 25 all units no fee

Have the first 2 boxes with non identical amounts caused the issue so i kept 2 units here and only sent 90 in.

4 boxes of @ 23 ea and 25 other sku were a fee also

40
Reply
user profile
Seller_Xm9ZXdbDd6NZw

The only way I've been able to avoid it and avoid guessing games is to ship 5 boxes with exactly equal qty for each sku. So I make sure all inventory sent can be divided by 5. Still doubled the shipping fees but cheaper than placements.

120
user profile
Seller_Xm9ZXdbDd6NZw

The only way I've been able to avoid it and avoid guessing games is to ship 5 boxes with exactly equal qty for each sku. So I make sure all inventory sent can be divided by 5. Still doubled the shipping fees but cheaper than placements.

120
Reply
user profile
Seller_zg0y8x3eUuxmH

Here's one, 4 skus, 3 boxes each so 12 boxes = placements fees. By adding a 5th sku, 1 box of 10 that would obviously have to be distributed, no placement fee. So adding something thats gonna cost them more money, reduces the fees?? Try the most absurd nonsensical thing you can think of, it just might work

70
user profile
Seller_zg0y8x3eUuxmH

Here's one, 4 skus, 3 boxes each so 12 boxes = placements fees. By adding a 5th sku, 1 box of 10 that would obviously have to be distributed, no placement fee. So adding something thats gonna cost them more money, reduces the fees?? Try the most absurd nonsensical thing you can think of, it just might work

70
Reply
user profile
Seller_m1K2JgvKy48rx

your mistake was mixing SKUs... trying 120 items of the same sku and send 20 of each skuski to 6 locations... or 6 boxes... they might have it go to 6 locations or 3 to 1 and 1 to 3 other facilities.... depending on demand they will say which centers need 1 or more boxes...

when you mix SKUs each SKU has to be able to split to 4 or more locations...

mixing 100 SKUs and 1 box each will not remove the placement fee .... each SKU has to be distributed in a way so it can hit 4 or more locations...

no placement fee...

sometimes I get away with 1 sku and 4 boxes or 1 sku and 5 boxes or 1 sku and 6 boxes...

keep playing around with combination but mixing SKus will make the math harder...

10
user profile
Seller_m1K2JgvKy48rx

your mistake was mixing SKUs... trying 120 items of the same sku and send 20 of each skuski to 6 locations... or 6 boxes... they might have it go to 6 locations or 3 to 1 and 1 to 3 other facilities.... depending on demand they will say which centers need 1 or more boxes...

when you mix SKUs each SKU has to be able to split to 4 or more locations...

mixing 100 SKUs and 1 box each will not remove the placement fee .... each SKU has to be distributed in a way so it can hit 4 or more locations...

no placement fee...

sometimes I get away with 1 sku and 4 boxes or 1 sku and 5 boxes or 1 sku and 6 boxes...

keep playing around with combination but mixing SKus will make the math harder...

10
Reply
user profile
Seller_BDsTW810tZE6e

We've had the same issues with placement fees, it's also 100%+ the cost of our original shipments. I'm a fairly new seller, started in 2020 but I was chatting with another seller that does way more then us from Los Angeles, and he told me that Amazon used to have this fee structure and they're just going back to the old shipping plans they used to do. Not sure if this is true but had me thinking about Amazon's historical processes.

The placement fee isn't too bad when you're shipping 40 units but when you ship 250+ in one box or shipment plan it get's expensive real fast with placement fees.

We are trying AWD to see if that'll be a more cost effective option then directly to FBA Warehouses.

We also haven't seen any FBA per unit fee decrease that would offset this cost like Amazon promised in previous articles. The FBA fee seems mostly unchanged with additional costs for "Placement Fees" & Shipping to fulfillment centers across the USA, instead of a more local option...

10
user profile
Seller_BDsTW810tZE6e

We've had the same issues with placement fees, it's also 100%+ the cost of our original shipments. I'm a fairly new seller, started in 2020 but I was chatting with another seller that does way more then us from Los Angeles, and he told me that Amazon used to have this fee structure and they're just going back to the old shipping plans they used to do. Not sure if this is true but had me thinking about Amazon's historical processes.

The placement fee isn't too bad when you're shipping 40 units but when you ship 250+ in one box or shipment plan it get's expensive real fast with placement fees.

We are trying AWD to see if that'll be a more cost effective option then directly to FBA Warehouses.

We also haven't seen any FBA per unit fee decrease that would offset this cost like Amazon promised in previous articles. The FBA fee seems mostly unchanged with additional costs for "Placement Fees" & Shipping to fulfillment centers across the USA, instead of a more local option...

10
Reply
user profile
Seller_Jq07AYj9eO4uX

My position is more extreme.

I have standard size, oversize and hazmat goods.

System forced me to either split all my full pallets goods and send 9 ltl shipments which cost $3000. or send 1 shipment pay $1500 plus $4000 placement fee.

All these goods only cost me $5000 but I'm paying $5500 to just ship to amazon warehouse???

50
user profile
Seller_Jq07AYj9eO4uX

My position is more extreme.

I have standard size, oversize and hazmat goods.

System forced me to either split all my full pallets goods and send 9 ltl shipments which cost $3000. or send 1 shipment pay $1500 plus $4000 placement fee.

All these goods only cost me $5000 but I'm paying $5500 to just ship to amazon warehouse???

50
Reply