Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_6oA09Nhj52unl

Unfair A-to-Z Claim – ODR Affected Even Though Buyer Confirmed Delivery

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an issue we had recently with an A-to-Z claim, hoping that a moderator might see this and help us fix the situation.

We had a customer who ordered blackout curtains (Order ID: 701-6247684-7465004). The package was delivered with UPS, and we even have visual proof of delivery. The customer later admitted they received the package, but claimed one item was missing.

Despite this, the A-to-Z claim was opened under the reason “Package did not arrive” and Amazon granted a full refund of CAD 339.44. This also added a hit to our Order Defect Rate (ODR).

Here’s why we believe this is really unfair:

• The buyer confirmed they received the package, so it’s clearly not a case of non-delivery.

• The delivery was on time, even earlier than Amazon’s estimated delivery window.

• We have visual proof from UPS showing the package was delivered.

• We were not contacted by Amazon before the decision was made.

• This is not a delivery issue, it was more like a return/missing item issue — completely different from “not received”.

This one claim is now affecting our ODR, and we feel really let down. As small sellers, we try our best to provide good service, but it’s very discouraging when these kinds of claims are granted unfairly.

We’ve already submitted a formal appeal through Seller Central, but unfortunately, we haven’t received any proper response.

Can a moderator please look into this? We just want the claim reviewed properly and the ODR impact removed, as this was clearly not a case of non-delivery.

Thanks a lot for your time and support!

Best regards,

10 views
0 replies
Tags:A to Z Claims, Customer, Refunds
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_6oA09Nhj52unl

Unfair A-to-Z Claim – ODR Affected Even Though Buyer Confirmed Delivery

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an issue we had recently with an A-to-Z claim, hoping that a moderator might see this and help us fix the situation.

We had a customer who ordered blackout curtains (Order ID: 701-6247684-7465004). The package was delivered with UPS, and we even have visual proof of delivery. The customer later admitted they received the package, but claimed one item was missing.

Despite this, the A-to-Z claim was opened under the reason “Package did not arrive” and Amazon granted a full refund of CAD 339.44. This also added a hit to our Order Defect Rate (ODR).

Here’s why we believe this is really unfair:

• The buyer confirmed they received the package, so it’s clearly not a case of non-delivery.

• The delivery was on time, even earlier than Amazon’s estimated delivery window.

• We have visual proof from UPS showing the package was delivered.

• We were not contacted by Amazon before the decision was made.

• This is not a delivery issue, it was more like a return/missing item issue — completely different from “not received”.

This one claim is now affecting our ODR, and we feel really let down. As small sellers, we try our best to provide good service, but it’s very discouraging when these kinds of claims are granted unfairly.

We’ve already submitted a formal appeal through Seller Central, but unfortunately, we haven’t received any proper response.

Can a moderator please look into this? We just want the claim reviewed properly and the ODR impact removed, as this was clearly not a case of non-delivery.

Thanks a lot for your time and support!

Best regards,

Tags:A to Z Claims, Customer, Refunds
00
10 views
0 replies
Reply
0 replies
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_6oA09Nhj52unl

Unfair A-to-Z Claim – ODR Affected Even Though Buyer Confirmed Delivery

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an issue we had recently with an A-to-Z claim, hoping that a moderator might see this and help us fix the situation.

We had a customer who ordered blackout curtains (Order ID: 701-6247684-7465004). The package was delivered with UPS, and we even have visual proof of delivery. The customer later admitted they received the package, but claimed one item was missing.

Despite this, the A-to-Z claim was opened under the reason “Package did not arrive” and Amazon granted a full refund of CAD 339.44. This also added a hit to our Order Defect Rate (ODR).

Here’s why we believe this is really unfair:

• The buyer confirmed they received the package, so it’s clearly not a case of non-delivery.

• The delivery was on time, even earlier than Amazon’s estimated delivery window.

• We have visual proof from UPS showing the package was delivered.

• We were not contacted by Amazon before the decision was made.

• This is not a delivery issue, it was more like a return/missing item issue — completely different from “not received”.

This one claim is now affecting our ODR, and we feel really let down. As small sellers, we try our best to provide good service, but it’s very discouraging when these kinds of claims are granted unfairly.

We’ve already submitted a formal appeal through Seller Central, but unfortunately, we haven’t received any proper response.

Can a moderator please look into this? We just want the claim reviewed properly and the ODR impact removed, as this was clearly not a case of non-delivery.

Thanks a lot for your time and support!

Best regards,

10 views
0 replies
Tags:A to Z Claims, Customer, Refunds
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_6oA09Nhj52unl

Unfair A-to-Z Claim – ODR Affected Even Though Buyer Confirmed Delivery

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an issue we had recently with an A-to-Z claim, hoping that a moderator might see this and help us fix the situation.

We had a customer who ordered blackout curtains (Order ID: 701-6247684-7465004). The package was delivered with UPS, and we even have visual proof of delivery. The customer later admitted they received the package, but claimed one item was missing.

Despite this, the A-to-Z claim was opened under the reason “Package did not arrive” and Amazon granted a full refund of CAD 339.44. This also added a hit to our Order Defect Rate (ODR).

Here’s why we believe this is really unfair:

• The buyer confirmed they received the package, so it’s clearly not a case of non-delivery.

• The delivery was on time, even earlier than Amazon’s estimated delivery window.

• We have visual proof from UPS showing the package was delivered.

• We were not contacted by Amazon before the decision was made.

• This is not a delivery issue, it was more like a return/missing item issue — completely different from “not received”.

This one claim is now affecting our ODR, and we feel really let down. As small sellers, we try our best to provide good service, but it’s very discouraging when these kinds of claims are granted unfairly.

We’ve already submitted a formal appeal through Seller Central, but unfortunately, we haven’t received any proper response.

Can a moderator please look into this? We just want the claim reviewed properly and the ODR impact removed, as this was clearly not a case of non-delivery.

Thanks a lot for your time and support!

Best regards,

Tags:A to Z Claims, Customer, Refunds
00
10 views
0 replies
Reply
user profile

Unfair A-to-Z Claim – ODR Affected Even Though Buyer Confirmed Delivery

by Seller_6oA09Nhj52unl

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an issue we had recently with an A-to-Z claim, hoping that a moderator might see this and help us fix the situation.

We had a customer who ordered blackout curtains (Order ID: 701-6247684-7465004). The package was delivered with UPS, and we even have visual proof of delivery. The customer later admitted they received the package, but claimed one item was missing.

Despite this, the A-to-Z claim was opened under the reason “Package did not arrive” and Amazon granted a full refund of CAD 339.44. This also added a hit to our Order Defect Rate (ODR).

Here’s why we believe this is really unfair:

• The buyer confirmed they received the package, so it’s clearly not a case of non-delivery.

• The delivery was on time, even earlier than Amazon’s estimated delivery window.

• We have visual proof from UPS showing the package was delivered.

• We were not contacted by Amazon before the decision was made.

• This is not a delivery issue, it was more like a return/missing item issue — completely different from “not received”.

This one claim is now affecting our ODR, and we feel really let down. As small sellers, we try our best to provide good service, but it’s very discouraging when these kinds of claims are granted unfairly.

We’ve already submitted a formal appeal through Seller Central, but unfortunately, we haven’t received any proper response.

Can a moderator please look into this? We just want the claim reviewed properly and the ODR impact removed, as this was clearly not a case of non-delivery.

Thanks a lot for your time and support!

Best regards,

Tags:A to Z Claims, Customer, Refunds
00
10 views
0 replies
Reply
0 replies
0 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity

Similar Discussions

Similar Discussions