Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?

All of us sellers (and our listings) are assessed using multitudes of metrics. Whether we like it or not, Amazon has to do it. Amazon, using their standards, needs to weed out bad or unwanted products or sellers.

But how about weeding out bad or abusive customers?

I believe a vast majority of Amazon's customers are decent and honest. However, there are really abusive customers. I've seen countless postings regarding customers doing "switcheroo." We've experienced a number of those customers. Since most of the items we are selling are low-priced items, we do not bother wasting time challenging abusive customer returns. A significant majority of the abuse we encounter, however, are from customers who are buying products without even reading the product details or description.

We are in the business of selling replacement parts. Replacement parts, by nature, do not work for all devices. So when listing products, we always try our best to describe the compatibility details.

But despite our efforts to provide more accurate product description and compatibility information, there are still customers who return products because they obviously did not read the product details. It's ok if the customer is honest enough to accept that they missed to read the product description. But there are many customers who chose "defective or does not work" as return reason just to get free returns (even though they can chose other return reasons and still get free returns). But when you read the return description, you'll find out the customer obviously did not read the product details. There are also many customers who intentionally write very vague comments on why they returned the product.

To make a long story short, there are many customers who are abusing Amazon's very generous return policy.

Here are some suggestions:

1. I think it's high time for Amazon to monitor customers' return rate. Just like putting threshold on various seller metrics, Amazon should do something to customers with return rates that are higher than a set threshold (e.g., Amazon may have to require these customers to pay return fees). Customers should see their return rates when they log in to their account.

2. All replacement parts being sold on Amazon should have a standard banner that says "Replacement Part: Read Compatibility Details Before Buying"

3. "Item defective or does not work" should be changed to simply "Item defective." Customers may erroneously chose "Item defective or does not work" when they are really mean "item not compatible." If the product "does not work", customer can simply choose defective. If the "item is not compatible", customers can chose either "Inaccurate website description" or "Bought by mistake". Further, "Bought by mistake" should be expanded to "Bought by mistake or missed to read product details"

Please be constructive. My objective is to influence positive changes in Amazon's Policies affecting us sellers without negatively impacting good customers.

989 views
27 replies
Tags:Customer, Negative reviews, Product reviews, Refunds, Return shipment
830
Reply
user profile
Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?

All of us sellers (and our listings) are assessed using multitudes of metrics. Whether we like it or not, Amazon has to do it. Amazon, using their standards, needs to weed out bad or unwanted products or sellers.

But how about weeding out bad or abusive customers?

I believe a vast majority of Amazon's customers are decent and honest. However, there are really abusive customers. I've seen countless postings regarding customers doing "switcheroo." We've experienced a number of those customers. Since most of the items we are selling are low-priced items, we do not bother wasting time challenging abusive customer returns. A significant majority of the abuse we encounter, however, are from customers who are buying products without even reading the product details or description.

We are in the business of selling replacement parts. Replacement parts, by nature, do not work for all devices. So when listing products, we always try our best to describe the compatibility details.

But despite our efforts to provide more accurate product description and compatibility information, there are still customers who return products because they obviously did not read the product details. It's ok if the customer is honest enough to accept that they missed to read the product description. But there are many customers who chose "defective or does not work" as return reason just to get free returns (even though they can chose other return reasons and still get free returns). But when you read the return description, you'll find out the customer obviously did not read the product details. There are also many customers who intentionally write very vague comments on why they returned the product.

To make a long story short, there are many customers who are abusing Amazon's very generous return policy.

Here are some suggestions:

1. I think it's high time for Amazon to monitor customers' return rate. Just like putting threshold on various seller metrics, Amazon should do something to customers with return rates that are higher than a set threshold (e.g., Amazon may have to require these customers to pay return fees). Customers should see their return rates when they log in to their account.

2. All replacement parts being sold on Amazon should have a standard banner that says "Replacement Part: Read Compatibility Details Before Buying"

3. "Item defective or does not work" should be changed to simply "Item defective." Customers may erroneously chose "Item defective or does not work" when they are really mean "item not compatible." If the product "does not work", customer can simply choose defective. If the "item is not compatible", customers can chose either "Inaccurate website description" or "Bought by mistake". Further, "Bought by mistake" should be expanded to "Bought by mistake or missed to read product details"

Please be constructive. My objective is to influence positive changes in Amazon's Policies affecting us sellers without negatively impacting good customers.

Tags:Customer, Negative reviews, Product reviews, Refunds, Return shipment
830
989 views
27 replies
Reply
27 replies
user profile
Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl

"Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?"

They should and they do.

They do not / should not share their findings with sellers. And they value buyers far more than sellers; buyers have more leeway; more tolerance.

But buyers have been banned before and will be again.

1518
user profile
SEAmod

@Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Thank you for making a constructive and informative post. I will share you sentiments with the partner business team. In the meantime, please know that I am in agreement with the post made by @Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl.

123
user profile
Seller_keSnEDesLFVwv

Amazon should file for criminal prosecution.

That is what many of these 'customers' are: they are criminals. They commit fraud. But Amazon management is afraid to stand up to them.

I've encountered two month old kittens who have more courage.

240
user profile
Seller_aUbEyzlSSnsDJ

Amazon could start a get caught get banded marketing program to let customers know they are paying attention. It would only offend scammers and let them know amazon cares about this subject. Amazon is to woke to offend the scammers instead they encourage buyer misuse of the platform.

143
user profile
Seller_zyG3AlejdFqKL

try to find in google to read some articles referring to return too many times

So, yes, it is certainly possible to get banned from Amazon—but, unless you are making an excessive number of returns and ignoring emails from Amazon, it’s unlikely that it’ll happen to you.

20
user profile
Seller_W1tFzATWCqDHQ

This is the only platform in which customers "did not receive their order" and request refunds.

110
user profile
Seller_yKsH1VcZkLlOV

I wish be able to block bad buyers, bad actors, just dissapear from their search, this is a key to control scammers that usually target very specific items / stores

60
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

If they buy and return what they have bought in the same condition, thats become part of selling online.

If they buy and switch or buy and return used damaged items they should be penalized.

60
user profile
Seller_CW0P5hgbsiqWX

Good suggestions, but for the past 20 years they have fallen on mute ears. You see, Amazon trained their buyers to scam buyers, return different products, and use false return reasons. This is the legacy Jeff Bezos left the company with, while he plays on his new super yacht.

Amazon cannot come out and publicly say it made a mistake, but behind the sceans, they are doing something, one buyer at a time, saying nothing. It has been over a year that Amazon has begun removing the return privileges, not allowing, "Bad Apples", to return any purchase. Although it would help if Amazon would not tell the buyer to go and ask the seller for a refund.

60
user profile
Seller_3xZhfSUQsfek8

How about just a customer rating or reviews similar to what Uber/Lyft have? That would absolutely assist us in making business decisions when shipping, communicating, refunds, etc.

50
user profile
Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?

All of us sellers (and our listings) are assessed using multitudes of metrics. Whether we like it or not, Amazon has to do it. Amazon, using their standards, needs to weed out bad or unwanted products or sellers.

But how about weeding out bad or abusive customers?

I believe a vast majority of Amazon's customers are decent and honest. However, there are really abusive customers. I've seen countless postings regarding customers doing "switcheroo." We've experienced a number of those customers. Since most of the items we are selling are low-priced items, we do not bother wasting time challenging abusive customer returns. A significant majority of the abuse we encounter, however, are from customers who are buying products without even reading the product details or description.

We are in the business of selling replacement parts. Replacement parts, by nature, do not work for all devices. So when listing products, we always try our best to describe the compatibility details.

But despite our efforts to provide more accurate product description and compatibility information, there are still customers who return products because they obviously did not read the product details. It's ok if the customer is honest enough to accept that they missed to read the product description. But there are many customers who chose "defective or does not work" as return reason just to get free returns (even though they can chose other return reasons and still get free returns). But when you read the return description, you'll find out the customer obviously did not read the product details. There are also many customers who intentionally write very vague comments on why they returned the product.

To make a long story short, there are many customers who are abusing Amazon's very generous return policy.

Here are some suggestions:

1. I think it's high time for Amazon to monitor customers' return rate. Just like putting threshold on various seller metrics, Amazon should do something to customers with return rates that are higher than a set threshold (e.g., Amazon may have to require these customers to pay return fees). Customers should see their return rates when they log in to their account.

2. All replacement parts being sold on Amazon should have a standard banner that says "Replacement Part: Read Compatibility Details Before Buying"

3. "Item defective or does not work" should be changed to simply "Item defective." Customers may erroneously chose "Item defective or does not work" when they are really mean "item not compatible." If the product "does not work", customer can simply choose defective. If the "item is not compatible", customers can chose either "Inaccurate website description" or "Bought by mistake". Further, "Bought by mistake" should be expanded to "Bought by mistake or missed to read product details"

Please be constructive. My objective is to influence positive changes in Amazon's Policies affecting us sellers without negatively impacting good customers.

989 views
27 replies
Tags:Customer, Negative reviews, Product reviews, Refunds, Return shipment
830
Reply
user profile
Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?

All of us sellers (and our listings) are assessed using multitudes of metrics. Whether we like it or not, Amazon has to do it. Amazon, using their standards, needs to weed out bad or unwanted products or sellers.

But how about weeding out bad or abusive customers?

I believe a vast majority of Amazon's customers are decent and honest. However, there are really abusive customers. I've seen countless postings regarding customers doing "switcheroo." We've experienced a number of those customers. Since most of the items we are selling are low-priced items, we do not bother wasting time challenging abusive customer returns. A significant majority of the abuse we encounter, however, are from customers who are buying products without even reading the product details or description.

We are in the business of selling replacement parts. Replacement parts, by nature, do not work for all devices. So when listing products, we always try our best to describe the compatibility details.

But despite our efforts to provide more accurate product description and compatibility information, there are still customers who return products because they obviously did not read the product details. It's ok if the customer is honest enough to accept that they missed to read the product description. But there are many customers who chose "defective or does not work" as return reason just to get free returns (even though they can chose other return reasons and still get free returns). But when you read the return description, you'll find out the customer obviously did not read the product details. There are also many customers who intentionally write very vague comments on why they returned the product.

To make a long story short, there are many customers who are abusing Amazon's very generous return policy.

Here are some suggestions:

1. I think it's high time for Amazon to monitor customers' return rate. Just like putting threshold on various seller metrics, Amazon should do something to customers with return rates that are higher than a set threshold (e.g., Amazon may have to require these customers to pay return fees). Customers should see their return rates when they log in to their account.

2. All replacement parts being sold on Amazon should have a standard banner that says "Replacement Part: Read Compatibility Details Before Buying"

3. "Item defective or does not work" should be changed to simply "Item defective." Customers may erroneously chose "Item defective or does not work" when they are really mean "item not compatible." If the product "does not work", customer can simply choose defective. If the "item is not compatible", customers can chose either "Inaccurate website description" or "Bought by mistake". Further, "Bought by mistake" should be expanded to "Bought by mistake or missed to read product details"

Please be constructive. My objective is to influence positive changes in Amazon's Policies affecting us sellers without negatively impacting good customers.

Tags:Customer, Negative reviews, Product reviews, Refunds, Return shipment
830
989 views
27 replies
Reply
user profile

Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?

by Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

All of us sellers (and our listings) are assessed using multitudes of metrics. Whether we like it or not, Amazon has to do it. Amazon, using their standards, needs to weed out bad or unwanted products or sellers.

But how about weeding out bad or abusive customers?

I believe a vast majority of Amazon's customers are decent and honest. However, there are really abusive customers. I've seen countless postings regarding customers doing "switcheroo." We've experienced a number of those customers. Since most of the items we are selling are low-priced items, we do not bother wasting time challenging abusive customer returns. A significant majority of the abuse we encounter, however, are from customers who are buying products without even reading the product details or description.

We are in the business of selling replacement parts. Replacement parts, by nature, do not work for all devices. So when listing products, we always try our best to describe the compatibility details.

But despite our efforts to provide more accurate product description and compatibility information, there are still customers who return products because they obviously did not read the product details. It's ok if the customer is honest enough to accept that they missed to read the product description. But there are many customers who chose "defective or does not work" as return reason just to get free returns (even though they can chose other return reasons and still get free returns). But when you read the return description, you'll find out the customer obviously did not read the product details. There are also many customers who intentionally write very vague comments on why they returned the product.

To make a long story short, there are many customers who are abusing Amazon's very generous return policy.

Here are some suggestions:

1. I think it's high time for Amazon to monitor customers' return rate. Just like putting threshold on various seller metrics, Amazon should do something to customers with return rates that are higher than a set threshold (e.g., Amazon may have to require these customers to pay return fees). Customers should see their return rates when they log in to their account.

2. All replacement parts being sold on Amazon should have a standard banner that says "Replacement Part: Read Compatibility Details Before Buying"

3. "Item defective or does not work" should be changed to simply "Item defective." Customers may erroneously chose "Item defective or does not work" when they are really mean "item not compatible." If the product "does not work", customer can simply choose defective. If the "item is not compatible", customers can chose either "Inaccurate website description" or "Bought by mistake". Further, "Bought by mistake" should be expanded to "Bought by mistake or missed to read product details"

Please be constructive. My objective is to influence positive changes in Amazon's Policies affecting us sellers without negatively impacting good customers.

Tags:Customer, Negative reviews, Product reviews, Refunds, Return shipment
830
989 views
27 replies
Reply
27 replies
27 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl

"Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?"

They should and they do.

They do not / should not share their findings with sellers. And they value buyers far more than sellers; buyers have more leeway; more tolerance.

But buyers have been banned before and will be again.

1518
user profile
SEAmod

@Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Thank you for making a constructive and informative post. I will share you sentiments with the partner business team. In the meantime, please know that I am in agreement with the post made by @Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl.

123
user profile
Seller_keSnEDesLFVwv

Amazon should file for criminal prosecution.

That is what many of these 'customers' are: they are criminals. They commit fraud. But Amazon management is afraid to stand up to them.

I've encountered two month old kittens who have more courage.

240
user profile
Seller_aUbEyzlSSnsDJ

Amazon could start a get caught get banded marketing program to let customers know they are paying attention. It would only offend scammers and let them know amazon cares about this subject. Amazon is to woke to offend the scammers instead they encourage buyer misuse of the platform.

143
user profile
Seller_zyG3AlejdFqKL

try to find in google to read some articles referring to return too many times

So, yes, it is certainly possible to get banned from Amazon—but, unless you are making an excessive number of returns and ignoring emails from Amazon, it’s unlikely that it’ll happen to you.

20
user profile
Seller_W1tFzATWCqDHQ

This is the only platform in which customers "did not receive their order" and request refunds.

110
user profile
Seller_yKsH1VcZkLlOV

I wish be able to block bad buyers, bad actors, just dissapear from their search, this is a key to control scammers that usually target very specific items / stores

60
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

If they buy and return what they have bought in the same condition, thats become part of selling online.

If they buy and switch or buy and return used damaged items they should be penalized.

60
user profile
Seller_CW0P5hgbsiqWX

Good suggestions, but for the past 20 years they have fallen on mute ears. You see, Amazon trained their buyers to scam buyers, return different products, and use false return reasons. This is the legacy Jeff Bezos left the company with, while he plays on his new super yacht.

Amazon cannot come out and publicly say it made a mistake, but behind the sceans, they are doing something, one buyer at a time, saying nothing. It has been over a year that Amazon has begun removing the return privileges, not allowing, "Bad Apples", to return any purchase. Although it would help if Amazon would not tell the buyer to go and ask the seller for a refund.

60
user profile
Seller_3xZhfSUQsfek8

How about just a customer rating or reviews similar to what Uber/Lyft have? That would absolutely assist us in making business decisions when shipping, communicating, refunds, etc.

50
user profile
Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl

"Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?"

They should and they do.

They do not / should not share their findings with sellers. And they value buyers far more than sellers; buyers have more leeway; more tolerance.

But buyers have been banned before and will be again.

1518
user profile
Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl

"Should Amazon identify and penalize abusive customers?"

They should and they do.

They do not / should not share their findings with sellers. And they value buyers far more than sellers; buyers have more leeway; more tolerance.

But buyers have been banned before and will be again.

1518
Reply
user profile
SEAmod

@Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Thank you for making a constructive and informative post. I will share you sentiments with the partner business team. In the meantime, please know that I am in agreement with the post made by @Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl.

123

@Seller_JFMM74Ov0fqLj

Thank you for making a constructive and informative post. I will share you sentiments with the partner business team. In the meantime, please know that I am in agreement with the post made by @Seller_Hi7wbO2Kbo6bl.

123
Reply
user profile
Seller_keSnEDesLFVwv

Amazon should file for criminal prosecution.

That is what many of these 'customers' are: they are criminals. They commit fraud. But Amazon management is afraid to stand up to them.

I've encountered two month old kittens who have more courage.

240
user profile
Seller_keSnEDesLFVwv

Amazon should file for criminal prosecution.

That is what many of these 'customers' are: they are criminals. They commit fraud. But Amazon management is afraid to stand up to them.

I've encountered two month old kittens who have more courage.

240
Reply
user profile
Seller_aUbEyzlSSnsDJ

Amazon could start a get caught get banded marketing program to let customers know they are paying attention. It would only offend scammers and let them know amazon cares about this subject. Amazon is to woke to offend the scammers instead they encourage buyer misuse of the platform.

143
user profile
Seller_aUbEyzlSSnsDJ

Amazon could start a get caught get banded marketing program to let customers know they are paying attention. It would only offend scammers and let them know amazon cares about this subject. Amazon is to woke to offend the scammers instead they encourage buyer misuse of the platform.

143
Reply
user profile
Seller_zyG3AlejdFqKL

try to find in google to read some articles referring to return too many times

So, yes, it is certainly possible to get banned from Amazon—but, unless you are making an excessive number of returns and ignoring emails from Amazon, it’s unlikely that it’ll happen to you.

20
user profile
Seller_zyG3AlejdFqKL

try to find in google to read some articles referring to return too many times

So, yes, it is certainly possible to get banned from Amazon—but, unless you are making an excessive number of returns and ignoring emails from Amazon, it’s unlikely that it’ll happen to you.

20
Reply
user profile
Seller_W1tFzATWCqDHQ

This is the only platform in which customers "did not receive their order" and request refunds.

110
user profile
Seller_W1tFzATWCqDHQ

This is the only platform in which customers "did not receive their order" and request refunds.

110
Reply
user profile
Seller_yKsH1VcZkLlOV

I wish be able to block bad buyers, bad actors, just dissapear from their search, this is a key to control scammers that usually target very specific items / stores

60
user profile
Seller_yKsH1VcZkLlOV

I wish be able to block bad buyers, bad actors, just dissapear from their search, this is a key to control scammers that usually target very specific items / stores

60
Reply
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

If they buy and return what they have bought in the same condition, thats become part of selling online.

If they buy and switch or buy and return used damaged items they should be penalized.

60
user profile
Seller_nBUcRErQhJ4JW

If they buy and return what they have bought in the same condition, thats become part of selling online.

If they buy and switch or buy and return used damaged items they should be penalized.

60
Reply
user profile
Seller_CW0P5hgbsiqWX

Good suggestions, but for the past 20 years they have fallen on mute ears. You see, Amazon trained their buyers to scam buyers, return different products, and use false return reasons. This is the legacy Jeff Bezos left the company with, while he plays on his new super yacht.

Amazon cannot come out and publicly say it made a mistake, but behind the sceans, they are doing something, one buyer at a time, saying nothing. It has been over a year that Amazon has begun removing the return privileges, not allowing, "Bad Apples", to return any purchase. Although it would help if Amazon would not tell the buyer to go and ask the seller for a refund.

60
user profile
Seller_CW0P5hgbsiqWX

Good suggestions, but for the past 20 years they have fallen on mute ears. You see, Amazon trained their buyers to scam buyers, return different products, and use false return reasons. This is the legacy Jeff Bezos left the company with, while he plays on his new super yacht.

Amazon cannot come out and publicly say it made a mistake, but behind the sceans, they are doing something, one buyer at a time, saying nothing. It has been over a year that Amazon has begun removing the return privileges, not allowing, "Bad Apples", to return any purchase. Although it would help if Amazon would not tell the buyer to go and ask the seller for a refund.

60
Reply
user profile
Seller_3xZhfSUQsfek8

How about just a customer rating or reviews similar to what Uber/Lyft have? That would absolutely assist us in making business decisions when shipping, communicating, refunds, etc.

50
user profile
Seller_3xZhfSUQsfek8

How about just a customer rating or reviews similar to what Uber/Lyft have? That would absolutely assist us in making business decisions when shipping, communicating, refunds, etc.

50
Reply