Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_6HXPDZ2n6YG3n

MADDESS A-to-Z Claim Accepted Over 70 Days After Refund – Unacceptable Treatment to Sellers

This is beyond unacceptable.

We issued a full refund over 70 days ago, and now the same buyer has somehow managed to open an A-to-Z claim on that already resolved order. The buyer does not have the item, has been returned and refunded in full, and yet Amazon has allowed this claim to proceed. How is this even possible?

This individual has ordered from us twice before and left two negative feedbacks within the very hour of delivery not just the same day, the same hour. We've reported this behaviour repeatedly, flagged it as abusive, and received no meaningful action in return either feedbacks remaining and keep harming my account.

Now, not only is this malicious buyer still active, they are being empowered to exploit the system further opening claims months after resolution. This is a clear breakdown in process and seller protection.

We are expected to meet the highest standards as sellers, yet we’re given zero defence against blatant abuse. Amazon’s failure to close such an obviously invalid claim is a direct threat to seller integrity and business stability.

Customer issue:

Property Damage or Personal Injury Incident

Delivery estimate: 18 February 2025 - 21 February 2025

We demand an explanation:

How is a claim allowed on a refunded order after 70+ days?

What safeguards are in place to prevent this kind of abuse?

Why are repeat offenders not being flagged and restricted?

Enough is enough. This treatment is not just unfair it is harmful. Amazon must be held accountable for failing to protect its sellers from this kind of exploitation.

img
4 views
0 replies
Tags:A to Z Claims, Buyer messages, Customer, Negative reviews
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_6HXPDZ2n6YG3n

MADDESS A-to-Z Claim Accepted Over 70 Days After Refund – Unacceptable Treatment to Sellers

This is beyond unacceptable.

We issued a full refund over 70 days ago, and now the same buyer has somehow managed to open an A-to-Z claim on that already resolved order. The buyer does not have the item, has been returned and refunded in full, and yet Amazon has allowed this claim to proceed. How is this even possible?

This individual has ordered from us twice before and left two negative feedbacks within the very hour of delivery not just the same day, the same hour. We've reported this behaviour repeatedly, flagged it as abusive, and received no meaningful action in return either feedbacks remaining and keep harming my account.

Now, not only is this malicious buyer still active, they are being empowered to exploit the system further opening claims months after resolution. This is a clear breakdown in process and seller protection.

We are expected to meet the highest standards as sellers, yet we’re given zero defence against blatant abuse. Amazon’s failure to close such an obviously invalid claim is a direct threat to seller integrity and business stability.

Customer issue:

Property Damage or Personal Injury Incident

Delivery estimate: 18 February 2025 - 21 February 2025

We demand an explanation:

How is a claim allowed on a refunded order after 70+ days?

What safeguards are in place to prevent this kind of abuse?

Why are repeat offenders not being flagged and restricted?

Enough is enough. This treatment is not just unfair it is harmful. Amazon must be held accountable for failing to protect its sellers from this kind of exploitation.

img
Tags:A to Z Claims, Buyer messages, Customer, Negative reviews
00
4 views
0 replies
Reply
0 replies
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_6HXPDZ2n6YG3n

MADDESS A-to-Z Claim Accepted Over 70 Days After Refund – Unacceptable Treatment to Sellers

This is beyond unacceptable.

We issued a full refund over 70 days ago, and now the same buyer has somehow managed to open an A-to-Z claim on that already resolved order. The buyer does not have the item, has been returned and refunded in full, and yet Amazon has allowed this claim to proceed. How is this even possible?

This individual has ordered from us twice before and left two negative feedbacks within the very hour of delivery not just the same day, the same hour. We've reported this behaviour repeatedly, flagged it as abusive, and received no meaningful action in return either feedbacks remaining and keep harming my account.

Now, not only is this malicious buyer still active, they are being empowered to exploit the system further opening claims months after resolution. This is a clear breakdown in process and seller protection.

We are expected to meet the highest standards as sellers, yet we’re given zero defence against blatant abuse. Amazon’s failure to close such an obviously invalid claim is a direct threat to seller integrity and business stability.

Customer issue:

Property Damage or Personal Injury Incident

Delivery estimate: 18 February 2025 - 21 February 2025

We demand an explanation:

How is a claim allowed on a refunded order after 70+ days?

What safeguards are in place to prevent this kind of abuse?

Why are repeat offenders not being flagged and restricted?

Enough is enough. This treatment is not just unfair it is harmful. Amazon must be held accountable for failing to protect its sellers from this kind of exploitation.

img
4 views
0 replies
Tags:A to Z Claims, Buyer messages, Customer, Negative reviews
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_6HXPDZ2n6YG3n

MADDESS A-to-Z Claim Accepted Over 70 Days After Refund – Unacceptable Treatment to Sellers

This is beyond unacceptable.

We issued a full refund over 70 days ago, and now the same buyer has somehow managed to open an A-to-Z claim on that already resolved order. The buyer does not have the item, has been returned and refunded in full, and yet Amazon has allowed this claim to proceed. How is this even possible?

This individual has ordered from us twice before and left two negative feedbacks within the very hour of delivery not just the same day, the same hour. We've reported this behaviour repeatedly, flagged it as abusive, and received no meaningful action in return either feedbacks remaining and keep harming my account.

Now, not only is this malicious buyer still active, they are being empowered to exploit the system further opening claims months after resolution. This is a clear breakdown in process and seller protection.

We are expected to meet the highest standards as sellers, yet we’re given zero defence against blatant abuse. Amazon’s failure to close such an obviously invalid claim is a direct threat to seller integrity and business stability.

Customer issue:

Property Damage or Personal Injury Incident

Delivery estimate: 18 February 2025 - 21 February 2025

We demand an explanation:

How is a claim allowed on a refunded order after 70+ days?

What safeguards are in place to prevent this kind of abuse?

Why are repeat offenders not being flagged and restricted?

Enough is enough. This treatment is not just unfair it is harmful. Amazon must be held accountable for failing to protect its sellers from this kind of exploitation.

img
Tags:A to Z Claims, Buyer messages, Customer, Negative reviews
00
4 views
0 replies
Reply
user profile

MADDESS A-to-Z Claim Accepted Over 70 Days After Refund – Unacceptable Treatment to Sellers

by Seller_6HXPDZ2n6YG3n

This is beyond unacceptable.

We issued a full refund over 70 days ago, and now the same buyer has somehow managed to open an A-to-Z claim on that already resolved order. The buyer does not have the item, has been returned and refunded in full, and yet Amazon has allowed this claim to proceed. How is this even possible?

This individual has ordered from us twice before and left two negative feedbacks within the very hour of delivery not just the same day, the same hour. We've reported this behaviour repeatedly, flagged it as abusive, and received no meaningful action in return either feedbacks remaining and keep harming my account.

Now, not only is this malicious buyer still active, they are being empowered to exploit the system further opening claims months after resolution. This is a clear breakdown in process and seller protection.

We are expected to meet the highest standards as sellers, yet we’re given zero defence against blatant abuse. Amazon’s failure to close such an obviously invalid claim is a direct threat to seller integrity and business stability.

Customer issue:

Property Damage or Personal Injury Incident

Delivery estimate: 18 February 2025 - 21 February 2025

We demand an explanation:

How is a claim allowed on a refunded order after 70+ days?

What safeguards are in place to prevent this kind of abuse?

Why are repeat offenders not being flagged and restricted?

Enough is enough. This treatment is not just unfair it is harmful. Amazon must be held accountable for failing to protect its sellers from this kind of exploitation.

img
Tags:A to Z Claims, Buyer messages, Customer, Negative reviews
00
4 views
0 replies
Reply
0 replies
0 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity